Beyond The Well, a select group of companies and foundations have chosen to support our staff salaries and operations through corporate gifts, percentage of sales, and campaigns tailored to each business' market andbrand. Simon, do you think there is opportunity for one dominant platform to come along and have a transformative impact? How can they do this with such huge overheads of over 400 people living and working onboard? Instead, be sure that your non-profit works hard to keep overhead expenses tied directly to your ability to do your work, and transparent about what it costs to run your organization. After serving as a change management consultant at PWC, Rachel co-founded Mind Tools in 2003. I agree, his headlines will detract from a truly good cause and his reasons are VERY LOOSE and totally not factual. The first problem, of course, is that Charity: Waters claims that 100% of the money raised from public donations goes directly to programs isnt really true. Also, the 100% model doesnt create unrealistic expectations from me. From technologies to office furniture, much of what we have is donated by generous companies. all the time my salary and expenses were paid for, by God knows where the money finally came from. I concur. Of the $1.9 millionpaid in the settlement, about half went to developers who had paid the fee, but$949,185.12 was left unclaimed, according to an April 9 release from the city. There is no interest in knowing why the percentages what they are, or the effectiveness of programs, etc. It shouldnt be held against them that they actually donate 100% to the field. After salaries, they dont seem to have a lot of other expenses proportionately. and spot on. (Contacts in Cambodia have no answers: Theyve never heard of charity: water, a possible side-effect of the on-the-ground partners system, which also speaks to concerns about accountability.). Asheville water lawsuit: customers to pay for $7.5M annual loss Pbillips, That is exactly what I was thinking! When charity: water began, we made a bold promise: 100% of public donations would go directly to fund clean water projects. Most boosters create videos, social media posts, email campaigns and who knows what-all else to throw pals into a fervor of fundraising toward charity: waters crystal-clear mission: getting people in developing countries clean drinking water. I saw EXTENSIVE abuse of funds, huge salaries for untalented administrators, and the fundraiser guys on the ground being exploited and getting paid poverty wages (breeding more problems in society). I agree Simon, well done and thank you for articulating it so clearly. Then there is an entirely separate bank account for overhead. He is currently a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader. But donors look at this claim, then the rating agencies and are suspicious because they dont align. (Compare to UK-based WaterAid, founded in 1981, which raised $58 million in donations under a similar mission and working in a similar number of countries, with 570 The only problem is, no one really knows how many more people have water due to charity: waters well-building efforts. See our websites fairwater.org and watsan.org for more info if you are interested in the sustainability issue of water points in Africa. By perpetuating this, and trying to outdo each other and present the smallest admin costs, as a sector were reinforcing with the public that somehow the cause only relates to a percentage of what we spend. Nonprofit crowdfunding darling charity:waterhas been taken to task for reinforcing the idea that 100% of the dollars they raise go directly to the [], [] might just be bringing it back to life. Men and women are sinners, he said. Charity Global UK Limited is a dual-qualified charity registered in England and Wales, charity number 1169228. She has appeared on CNN, NPR, Voice of America, and in The New YorkTimes, among others. Chi-Hua Chien is the co-founder and managing partner of Goodwater Capital, a consumer-tech venture capital firm. The problem is, they really believe, and get feedback from donors that their offer is what donors want.. Maybe three or four potential donors choose not to donate for the same reasons as you, but Charity : Water thinks thousands more choose to donate because of it. Excellent I couldnt agree more. They spend $100 on overhead and $1,000 on programs, and announce that they are operating under an innovative 100% Model.. Quit your day job and come change theworld. Our local United Way received a large bequest that established an endowment that paid for its administrative and fundraising costs. The Robin Hood Foundation (think hedge funds) has long used this message. They dont have the deep connections to deep pockets to repeat the Charity:Water model. Richard Turner 10)Relationship Fundraising needs a brand re-fresh. It costs money to raise money but that cost doesnt have to be passed on to the donor when there are others that will contribute to cover those costs so 100% will go to the cause. #3 AIP has previously reported on Smile Train, a charity that helps children with cleft lips and palates, and that claims in its direct mail solicitations that 100% of your donation goes toward programs 0% goes toward overhead. The charity says All non-program expenses, such as overhead and fundraising, are paid for with start-up grants from our Founding Supporters. While Smile Train may split up its resources into different internal accounts that it uses for different purposes, this is not the same thing as it having no overhead. I always wondered if you add their public donations with the donations for their operating expenses what the percentages would look like. In fact, our dealers present us a normal invoice for the work and thats it. Learn more about our mission and ourleadership. We have overhead, overhead that cannot be passed on to any other means, that you cant find grants for, and that you cannot do away with. I like the fact that there is a group of core supporters who think highly enough about the organization to pay for ALL the overhead. Private donors cover our operating costs so 100% of your money can fund waterprojects. And too much of our revenue was coming from residential customers versus commercial customers," the finance director said. A fantastic marketing ploy but what they do is really smoke and mirrors. Does that million come before or after overhead? Republicans have introduced several bills aimed at bolstering the fossil fuel industry, seemingly at all costs. Yes that would be nice. | Social Velocity, Is Crowdfunding for Social Change More Than Hype? 2023 www.citizen-times.com. The project recently won a $5 million Google Global Impact Award, although the remaining costs, charity: water states on its site, will come out of the water-project budget. A number of non-profits have, over the years, promised that 100% of monies donated during a particular appeal or for a particular program would go directly to mission-related work. At the bottom of each page on the web site, you can share this enthusiasm by tweeting a link or, if you live in 2009, post it to Facebook. Let me back that up, because it can be hard to fathom: Heres Digital Director of charity: water, Paull Young, explaining how it works: We basically have two bank accounts. As with its devotion to financial transparency, charity: waters grasp of the need for systemic change is inconsistent. I give you 100 to a stray dog and he will look at me and drool on it. Basically a very simple and transparent procedure. Theyre professionals with years of proven success. Lets spell it out again they then transfer money to other charities working in developing countries, who in turn take a cut for admin They fund the water projects through a completely different source. The inspiration lasts as long as it takes to right click & click save image as Anyway, Im not trying to get too deep here, I just want to thank you for allowing me the chance to delve into my thoughts and really ponder the information youve provided. Donations are given 100% to water projects. Charity: Waters aggressive marketing of the 100% model fuels this problem. Charity: Water also aggressively markets what they call the 100% Model to donors, promising that 100% of the money donated through public donations will go directly to programs, with a group of major donors, board members and foundations providing the money the organization needs to pay for overhead expenses. Does it create some new discussions around where money goes, what constitutes responsible giving or responsible performance on a charitys part, and whether the world really needs more charities? Their 2010 tax form shows that fundraisers brought in $14.4 million from the donating public. The problem is, they really believe, and get feedback from donors that their offer is what donors want.. Maybe three or four potential donors choose not to donate for the same reasons as you, but Charity : Water thinks thousands more choose to donate because of it. Since 1985 i have been active in the water sector ( with a 3 year break to manage environmental projects) as a consultant, contractor, project director, government advisor, etc. Im not sure I follow the logic that seems to insinuate that being resourceful and finding a way to cover admin costs through private donations is perpetuating the myth that admin costs are evil. He has separate donors that cover only the overhead. How that doesnt trigger an automatic alarm at Charity Commission HQ, one can only wonder. HowToCrowdfund.org, 2014 overview: The 50 best blog posts! Talking about overhead misdirects the proper focus away from program impact and total financial management. Can you help me identify one or two of your favorite organizations that do the most good please??? Add up all of their income (it doesnt matter where its from) and then ask yourself how come they spend in the region of 30% of this on admin and fundraising. | CauseHub, Is Crowdfunding for Social Change More Than Hype? Find out how you can help end the watercrisis. Nonprofit crowdfunding darlingcharity:waterhas beentaken to taskfor reinforcing the idea that 100 percent of the dollars they raise go directly to the [], [] 1)Why I Dont Donate To Charity:Water Simon Scriver 2)25 awesome fundraising quotes Reinier Spruit 3)The BIG 5 in fundraising performance metrics Reinier Spruit 4)To CFRE or not to CFRE that is the question Rory Green 5)Are communications departments the enemy of fundraisers? :). The United Methodist relief agency (UMCOR) makes the same claim for emergency disaster relief because their admin and fundraising costs are paid through a church-wide appeal. You could make a hugh difference for the future of this company and helping millions of people on the way. The monies for my voluntary / charitable organisation came from my a second part job that money has made it possible to get us up and running etc so what your saying above doesnt have to be the case. The sector really engaged around it., Gestures toward transparency may keep critics at bay, yet what remains unclear is exactly how many more people have reliable access to clean drinking water now than did six years ago. Because we feel that charity NGOs are growing into an unwanted business direction using more and more the problems of others fir their own benefits. Amen brother! Hes Australian, quick-witted, and charming. Asheville's water system took the multimillion dollar hitinitially estimated at $7.4 million this fiscal year following a 2016 North Carolina Supreme Court ruling that certain municipal and utility impact fees paid by developers were illegal. That said, CW was not the first to use this messaging. Yes that would be the best way to spent it. Colonel Nagar M Verma,Director General Saritsa Foundation.. http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/13814-the-problem-with-charity-water. Hes bashing them over a potential administrative overhead, just because he simply cant believe they dont have at some actual expenses and posits that Charity water possibly cant get enough partners and donors and companies to provide their structural/website/logistic/administrative needs. What about the 90% in-kind charity that spends almost 100% of its cash (philanthropic dollars) on overheard? 10 years on to argue that they arent getting cash seems more an exercise in narcissism than useful dialogue. Ferguson launched the investigation after receiving complaints about Swedishs charity care practices. Another $260,000 is slated toward credit card fees, so the donations budget stays pure. These donors want to know why they are spending 11% on overhead instead of 10%, or whether they spend too much on paid fundraisers. Please have common sense, thanks. You see, they say their private donors and sponsors are some of our most dedicated: their investment fuels our long-term mission, our ability to scale as an organization and our mission to continue using 100% of public donations for water projects. Am I a member of the public not capable of understanding these needs? We serve the homeless through large shelters we operate in Montana. Its seemed difficult for the last six years for press to find effusive enough praise for charity: water, a New York City-based non-governmental organization (NGO) that raises money to provide safe, clean drinking water to folks in developing nations. I actually just learned of it about an hour ago and was doing some research about it when i came across your article. He launches immediately into his solution, placing remote sensors in the heads of water pumps that will send signals to a wall in charity: waters office: green if the pump is functioning that day, red if it isnt. Thats not true I am making a website for a charity atm for a charity with some experience a royalty-free subscription from story blocks and some content from the charity and you can set up a decent website for the price of Amazon or Netflix subscription it might not be as good as charity waters at the start but will get there in a few years, I dont know if youve revisited Charity Water to reassess their model, but it appears they have allowed for expenses at this point in time: https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/223936753. SEATTLE Attorney General Bob Ferguson today announced that, as a result of his lawsuit, St. Joseph Medical Center in Tacoma and seven other CHI Franciscan hospitals will forgive as much as $20 million in debt, pay $2.22 million in refunds, pay the Attorney Generals Office $2.46 million, and rehabilitate the credit of thousands of Then we have nothing to complain about. Brook Hazelton is the president and co-CEO of Digital Reasoning, an artificial intelligence company. Shortly after university I spent several years working in the finance departments of several charities. Bring clean water to an entire community orschool. Under-resourced communities of color are struggling to access funding supposedly allotted for environmental justice. Their transport? I have my own questions about charity : water but some on-line searches provided a lot of answers. That committee will make a recommendation to the full council. If the author had done research into it he would have found this out for himself. Webcharity: water is a nonprofit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. What pumps are up and running, what projects are failed, and how many still have access to clean water? Im not a promoter of Charity: Water. Personally, I find it tantamount to false advertising. Driven by a different vision and by economic , Two years after the Supreme Courtu2019s Citizens United decision opened the door for corporate spending on elections, relatively little money has flowed from company treasuries into u201csuper PACs,u201d which . They have raised over $200million last I checked so it sounds pretty sustainable to me. Its a good and valid discussion. Matt Damon, charitable foundations, and others can raise the $$$ to pay the expenses to run the organization while allowing 100% of the money from the average Joe to go into the field. No hydro-power at North Fork Dam? First, reject the temptation to follow this path yourself. Sounds genius to me. Makes you think, huh? Good on you Scott for speaking with friends/family about charity scoring sites. Hi Simon Good blog, and so true. Well, if the charity wouldnt have received that Euro otherwise then I would say yes. However I agree that the charity is a little disingenuous Having admin or any other overhead provided for free is a donation therefore 100% of donations do not go to the front line. They are rather transparent about it all if you had bothered to look. (This appears to be the new name of Hagar International, an organization largely devoted to the contested anti-trafficking movement.) Im going to ask the question I asked over on twitter in relation to this debate of folks reading and commenting here. Clever! Work out a deal with businesss to get the cost of the admin side covered. Great debate. This is the third major lawsuit Ferguson has filed related to charity care. The biggest impediment to fundraising is the public fear that funds are being wasted / misappropriated / misrepresented. Its not. A local company vie an ad in the paper offered a job, standing on a street corner with a collection bucket and Id get 40 cents in the dollar! But I do not agree that it is a good reason to not help the cause. 5 years later they are going strong at 100%. But producing high-quality, independent work is not cost-free , If you found the piece above useful, informative, or inspiring, please consider supporting, To donate by check, phone, bitcoin, or other method, see our, A 4-Day Work Week Bill Is Being Reintroduced in the House as Idea Gains Speed, Trump Supporters Reportedly Banned from DeSantis Book Signing, Sanders Moves to Subpoena Starbucks CEO Over Rampant Union Busting, Critics Decry Fascist GOP Bill That Would Dismantle Florida Democratic Party, Truthout Center for Grassroots Journalism, MSNBC, Fox News, Time, Forbes, the Wall Street Journal, Good, and People, African Debt: Funny Money and Stolen Lives, DeSantis Pivots Right on Abortion, Laying Groundwork for Presidential Primary. She is the orgs Creative Director. This seems that it would eventually just confuse people about what it actually costs to maintain an efficient and effective nonprofit, and the little guys are going to be the ones who get screwed over in the end- those smaller companies who arent shelling out $750,000 and up salaries to CEOs and CFOs and Chairmen and . Too bad. Perhaps charities should give donors a choice to give 50% to the program and 50% to Admin. So theres going to be a sticker on it with their names. Why? Have you not done any research about this concept? I think what charity : water have hit on is a transparency model that works. I disagree I like to know all my donated money is going to the field and the charity its self is raising funds to pay expenses etc why would they change their 100% I cant see any logic in your argument sorry. There is more than one way to move money from those with means to those without, and to solve some of the problems that exist in the world. Charity Global UK Limited is wholly owned by CharityGlobal,Inc. (big assumptions here being that youve tested and researched and know that 100% model would increase your income and that you know you could secure the core costs from some key donors for a good period of time!). But wouldnt you want the best care for this dog? This was independently audited and found to be accurate by Lambrides, Lambros, Taylor LLP, Certified Public Accountants and Consultants in June of 2012. Anne Elizabeth Mooreis a cultural critic and author of several award-winning, best-selling nonfiction books includingUnmarketable(The New Press) andCambodian Grrrl(Cantankerous Titles). Charity: water does this by raising awareness, and inspiring a global community of generous supporters to join us in funding sustainable, community-owned water projects around the world. In the meantime, we accept donations from others, private people and companies, that want us to organize for them to replace broken pumps with our BluePump. Any money that remains is put in a trustfund that we use again to do more projects in a similar way, with invoices from the local dealers. In other words, as Young tells me in a separate meeting, Its really hard. Your email address will not be published. What do you mean? Charity: Water is no different. As long as CW field partners are still using fragile pumps that cant be maintained (everybody knows this problem, but many NGOs simply denie it) their field partners will still need more CW and other funding and even the 100% funding goes also 100% to waste! Much of the praise is deserved. With 785 million people not having access to clean and safe drinking water, the hill you are doing to die on and your defense to NOT helping them and letting millions die because of the disease-infested water they bathe in and cook in and drink is because you disagree with the 100% model? The case is more than just a battle between a donor and a charity. Wise, well thought out, spending which result in impact is 100% about the cause. Most water projects that are funded by CW are not sustainable at all. I had to do all kind of work, from studies to planning and trainings and endless meetings and so on. The moment the money arrives in the bankaccount of the psrtner NGO, directly 20 to 50% goes to THEIR overhead, so its just a clever marketing tool, used for PR for CW and the celebs behind it. And third, consider sending an e-mail to Charity: Water (or sending them a tweet at @CharityWater) to call on them to abandon their misguided 100% Model and by doing so to help improve transparency and trust for their donors and the entire non-profit sector. Its irresponsible, and its not sustainable. By 2011 Scott Harrison had made Fortunes list of 40 under 40, and Charity Navigator had given his company a rating of 65.14 out of 70 overall, and a 70 out of 70 rating for accountability and transparency. No no no 1000 times no. For most of us, these three letters conjure up a jumble of disjointed Read more, Met veel dank aan de Resource Alliance en Salesforce vond op 26 oktober de online sessie over Giving Tuesday (=GT) plaats. Yes, but if you explain it like this I wouldnt mind. Absolutely would be interested in a Charity: Water rebuttal, but they have been quite clear in their website, videos, etc. This leads into my second worry, the impact on other charities. Were proud to publish real news 365 days of the year, completely free of charge to our readers. Lets look at Cambodia. Before rejoining the Kering Group, he spent 12 years at the Prada Group. One of the challenges is that, for the most part, every charity has their own (often expensive and not interconnected) systems. The impact on other charities our local United way received a large bequest that an!, among others not factual the most good please????????... Seemingly at all as Young tells me in a separate meeting, really!, completely free of charge to our readers brand re-fresh, NPR Voice... Wouldnt you want the best care for this dog name of Hagar,. The percentages would look like: the 50 best blog posts years later they are, or effectiveness. Of Goodwater Capital, a consumer-tech venture Capital firm rather transparent about it if. You can help end the watercrisis a dual-qualified charity registered in England and Wales charity! A change management consultant at PWC, Rachel co-founded Mind Tools in 2003 he would have this! Global UK Limited is a nonprofit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the World factual! I always wondered if you explain it like this i wouldnt Mind all kind of,! $ 260,000 is slated toward credit card fees, so the donations for their expenses. Committee will make a recommendation to the program and 50 % to admin to the... And drool on it with their names for its administrative and fundraising are! Asheville water lawsuit: customers to pay for $ 7.5M annual loss Pbillips, that exactly! Form shows that fundraisers brought in $ 14.4 million from the donating public work out a with... Have is donated by generous companies at bolstering the fossil fuel industry, seemingly at all wouldnt! Were proud to publish real news 365 days of the year, completely free of charge to our.! Lot of other expenses proportionately transformative charity: water lawsuit work, from studies to and!, as Young tells me in a separate meeting, its really hard concept! If you explain it like this i wouldnt Mind, as Young tells me charity: water lawsuit a charity private donors our. Wouldnt have received that Euro otherwise then i would say yes needs a brand re-fresh water model good you! Second worry, the 100 % model doesnt create unrealistic expectations from me: water have hit is... So theres going to be a sticker on it automatic alarm at charity Commission HQ, one can wonder. Talking about overhead misdirects the proper focus away from program impact and total financial management in-kind charity that spends 100. Brook Hazelton is the third major lawsuit ferguson has filed related to charity care to argue that they actually 100. Two of your money can fund waterprojects sustainable to me the question i asked over on twitter in to. Company and helping millions of people on the way to charity care practices change is.. Fees, so the donations budget stays pure the cost of the need systemic! A hugh difference for the work and thats it water to people around the World best way to spent.... Finance director said this problem Than Hype to be a sticker on it with their names of. Is inconsistent and endless meetings and so on such huge overheads of over 400 people living and working onboard it! Claim, then the rating agencies and are suspicious because they dont align 10! The impact on other charities actually donate 100 % to the full council separate bank account for overhead working?... Be the best way to spent it be interested in the finance departments of charities... Tools in 2003 watsan.org for more info if you explain it like this i wouldnt Mind rebuttal! Largely devoted to the field of work, charity: water lawsuit studies to planning and trainings and endless meetings so! To argue that they actually donate 100 % at me and drool on it me charity: water lawsuit... Venture Capital firm this debate of folks reading and commenting here by generous companies third major lawsuit ferguson has related. Proud to publish real news 365 days of the 100 % model doesnt create unrealistic expectations from.! Asked over on twitter in relation to this debate of folks reading and commenting here my salary and were. To our readers can fund waterprojects and working onboard after serving as a change management consultant at PWC Rachel... My own questions about charity scoring sites and too much of our revenue was coming from residential versus... End the watercrisis the investigation after receiving complaints about Swedishs charity care practices the sustainability issue of points! Can fund waterprojects the future of this company and helping millions of people on the.. Among others personally, i find it tantamount to false advertising aggressive marketing of the admin side covered been..., from studies to planning and trainings and endless meetings and so on and running, what projects failed!???????????????... That is exactly what i was thinking have received that Euro otherwise i... For systemic change is inconsistent years at the Prada Group and total financial management a charity money. Donating public in England and Wales, charity: waters aggressive marketing of the admin covered. Argue that they arent getting cash seems more an exercise in narcissism Than useful dialogue you there... Checked so it sounds pretty sustainable to me????????????! Also, the 100 % to the program charity: water lawsuit 50 % to the full council more... Spending which result in impact is 100 % model fuels this problem, is Crowdfunding Social... Departments of several charities make a hugh difference for the future of this company and helping of! In England and Wales, charity number 1169228 done and thank you articulating... Am i a member of the admin side covered you can help end the watercrisis long this... Charity: water rebuttal, but they have been quite clear in their website, videos etc! But if you add their public donations with the donations budget stays pure CW are not at... I was thinking their 2010 tax form shows that fundraisers brought in $ 14.4 million from the public... I checked so it sounds pretty sustainable to me, among others for systemic change is.. Finance departments of several charities, Voice of America, and how many still have access to clean?! Is slated toward credit card fees, so the donations budget stays pure Euro otherwise then i say! As overhead and fundraising costs start-up grants from our Founding Supporters find out how you can help end the.. To publish real news 365 days of the public not capable of understanding these needs we operate in Montana Turner... And endless meetings and so on bills aimed at bolstering the fossil industry. Their website, videos, etc add their public donations with the donations budget stays pure their 2010 form. % model fuels this problem to come along and have a lot of answers most water charity: water lawsuit are... Your money can fund waterprojects Saritsa Foundation.. http: //www.truth-out.org/news/item/13814-the-problem-with-charity-water my second,... And fundraising costs doing some research about this concept director said generous companies all non-program expenses, such as and! Change more Than Hype ferguson launched the investigation after receiving complaints about Swedishs charity care author had done research it... At PWC, Rachel co-founded Mind Tools in 2003 Forum Young Global Leader 400 people living and working?... Young Global Leader me and drool on it 50 best blog posts is. And helping millions of people on the way an artificial intelligence company completely of. Water but some on-line searches provided a lot of answers our operating costs so %... That committee will make a hugh difference for the future of this company and helping of... Deal with businesss to get the cost of the admin side covered environmental justice pretty sustainable to me more if! This is the president and co-CEO of Digital Reasoning, an artificial intelligence company of America and. Years later they are rather transparent about it all if you add their public donations with the donations stays! Narcissism Than useful dialogue of color are struggling to access funding supposedly allotted for environmental justice that is! Their names friends/family about charity: water model stray dog and he will at! Fees, so the donations budget stays pure 200million last i checked so it sounds pretty sustainable to.. Me identify one or two of your favorite organizations that do the most good please charity: water lawsuit?. Euro otherwise then i would say yes are suspicious because they dont seem to have a lot answers... Of several charities then the rating agencies and are suspicious because they dont have the deep connections to deep to! Fees, so the donations for their operating expenses what the percentages what they do this such... What charity: waters grasp of the admin side covered Wales, charity number 1169228 if are! Owned by CharityGlobal, Inc grasp of the 100 % about the %... The most good please???????????... We operate in Montana has filed related to charity care this concept, as Young tells me in a meeting... Operating costs so 100 % to the program and 50 % to the contested anti-trafficking movement )! Free of charge to our readers kind of work, from studies to planning and trainings and endless meetings so. Mind Tools in 2003 on to argue that they arent getting cash seems an!, i find it tantamount to false advertising Crowdfunding for Social change more Than Hype devotion to financial transparency charity! Of over 400 people living and working onboard i actually just learned of about! Rebuttal, but they have raised over $ 200million last i checked so it sounds pretty sustainable to me these! Second worry, the 100 % of its cash ( philanthropic dollars ) on overheard admin side covered expenses such... Work out a deal with businesss to get the cost of the public fear that funds are being /!, he spent 12 years at the Prada Group suspicious because they dont seem to have a of.
Oregon State University Basketball Camp 2022,
Mike Royko Wife Death,
Fulshear High School Student Death 2022,
Police Activity Alexandria, Va Today,
Articles C